What’s worth it, what’s not

The equestrian world has entered the digital age, and not just in the show office. From rein tension sensors to girth pressure monitors, heart rate trackers, arena cameras, and motion analysis software, the modern tack room is starting to look more like a laboratory. But for every welfare-driven breakthrough, there’s a flashy gadget that raises questions: Is this improving the horse’s experience, or just giving riders more data to ignore?

This article explores what technology is currently being used in equestrian sport, what’s showing genuine value for horse welfare and performance, and what might be more about marketing than meaningful change.

Pressure-mapping pads

These thin, sensor-equipped pads are placed under the saddle to detect areas of excessive pressure. The data is displayed in colourful heat maps that show how pressure shifts in motion – walk, trot, canter, collected vs extended – and with different riders or saddles.

When they work well:

• Revealing uneven weight distribution (e.g. saddle slipping to one side)
• Confirming when a saddle is bridging or pinching
• Helping saddle fitters or vets assess asymmetrical riders or horses
• Tracking change over time (e.g. after rehab or retraining)

Potential pitfalls:

• Requires interpretation by an experienced fitter or vet
• Only provide part of the story as they don’t assess tree shape, shoulder clearance, or spinal alignment
• Horses may react to the pad itself leading to false positives

Verdict: WORTH IT, when used by qualified professionals and paired with a thorough saddle fit assessment.

Rein tension meters

Rein tension sensors track the amount of pressure exerted on each rein, providing data on symmetry, consistency, and magnitude of contact. Some models display this in real-time or sync to video footage.

Promising applications:

• Identifying unconscious asymmetry in the rider’s hands
• Comparing contact between riders or bits
• Teaching riders to find consistent, elastic contact without excessive pressure

Limitations:

• Doesn’t differentiate between soft, following contact and stiff pulling
• Riders may chase ‘even numbers’ at the expense of correct feel
• Can be distracting or misleading without a coaching context

Verdict: WORTH IT for coaching or research but NOT ESSENTIAL for the average rider unless guided by a trained eye.

Heart rate monitors and biometric trackers

Originally popular in endurance and racing, these tools are now being used in dressage, jumping, and rehab settings to track fitness and recovery.

Best uses:

• Monitoring heart rate recovery after work
• Detecting subclinical pain or stress (e.g. unexpected spikes in easy work)
• Measuring baseline fitness during conditioning
• Some models also track respiratory rate, movement patterns, and workload

Verdict: WORTH IT, especially for horses in rehab, young horse training, or competition prep. These monitors can improve welfare by identifying hidden stress or overload.

Motion analysis systems and inertial sensors

Often used by vets and researchers, these systems use markers or sensors placed on joints to assess symmetry, gait phases, and movement patterns, both in hand and under saddle.

Clinical strengths:

• Detecting subtle lameness or asymmetries
• Tracking progress over time in rehab
• Assessing gait mechanics in young horses or sales prospects

Drawbacks:

• Expensive and time-consuming
• Requires specialist equipment and trained interpretation
• Not a substitute for a full lameness exam

Verdict: WORTH IT for vets and elite riders, but NOT practical for everyday use unless part of a diagnostic or research setting.

Behaviour monitors and cameras

These include:

• 24/7 stall cameras
• Wearable movement sensors for turnout or stable time
• Systems that track sleep, lying time, and movement patterns

Why they’re useful:

• Catching signs of colic, pain, or sleep deprivation
• Monitoring horses prone to ulcers or stereotypies (cribbing, weaving)
• Ensuring stall-rested horses are coping
• Tracking overnight behaviour in new environments

Verdict: WORTH IT for monitoring welfare, especially in horses with known issues or horses on box rest.

Virtual coaching and rider apps

There’s a growing range of apps for:

• GPS ride tracking
• Training logs
• Virtual coaching (via video review or real-time feedback)
• Gamified rider posture apps and balance trainers

Good for:

• Increasing rider accountability
• Tracking training consistency and progress
• Receiving remote input from coaches or vets

Less helpful if:

• Replacing in-person coaching altogether
• Creating data overload without clear goals

Verdict: WORTH IT if used with purpose, not pressure. Data should guide the feel, not override it.

The risk or more data

One of the biggest concerns with high-tech tack is that it can tempt riders to chase metrics rather than listen to the horse. If rein tension is ‘even’ but the horse is tight in the back, the metric is meaningless. If the saddle passes a pressure test but the horse still swishes his tail or grinds his teeth, that communication still matters.

Technology should support good horsemanship, not replace it.

Final thoughts

Technology is only as useful as the insight it brings. If it deepens your understanding of the horse’s comfort, symmetry, or stress response, it’s worth considering. If it replaces feel, adds pressure, or creates confusion, it’s time to reassess.

Don’t buy the tool for the gadget’s sake. Buy it because you want to be a better partner to your horse.